Permalink Reply by Rhoda Cronebach on July 25, 2009 at 6:08pm
Permalink Reply by David M. Edwards on August 3, 2009 at 8:37pm You don't have to print to 35mm film to show at Sundance, they accept digital formats. Not sure about Tribeca though.
Permalink Reply by Ann Allen on August 4, 2009 at 5:06am
Permalink Reply by David M. Edwards on August 5, 2009 at 1:15pm This may ramble a bit, so please forgive me.
I think it's all about passion vs. pennies. Of all the films in development you've heard about, for which of them would you be willing to mortgage your house or sell your children into slavery? My guess is... none.
[a digression] - I've run into a number of individuals over the years who want to be filmmakers, not make films.
Maybe it's like trying to get a cat to sit in your lap. You can chase it around - and they're very good at staying just out of fingertip's reach - or you can sit quietly and do something that raises the cat's curiosity enough to come over and investigate. All the way into your lap.
Why is filmmaking equipment so expensive? Well, how many Panaflex cameras do you suppose are made each year? I know my neighbor isn't looking for a set of neutral density filters at the moment.
You can't do it all yourself but how the heck can you find twenty others to help?
If I see one more scene in a bar where two guys chatter about their mid-20s angst issues I'm gonna scream. I am.
The problem is much like this: When I used to fly my little airplane I flew in the same sky where the big airplanes flew. They had millions of dollars worth of equipment to help them, I had a couple thousand dollars worth. And yet, we both had to do essentially the same thing - take off, fly, and land - and do it in exactly the same place.
I'm struggling to get a really small film financed now. There are costs I simply can not eliminate. Even though I'm literally building most of my own equipment (I'm fortunate that I can do that). There are absolutes that for reasons of economic logic are never discounted - food, insurance, etc. So that leaves as the only flexible option the human actors and crew. My film will literally live or die based solely on my ability to help someone become equally passionate about it... and then take one step more.
I live in an area where there are always lots and lots of productions underway and hardly anyone is being paid. Several years ago I swore I would not ask anyone to work for nothing again. If someone volunteers, fine, but I won't ask for volunteers. That also means my film will need more money.
With respect to Dave's comment, I agree. But there is also a scale to consider. Let's say I cash in everything to make my film - clear evidence of either congenital insanity or near-biblical dedication. But I do it anyway. How can I create value for everyone else who participates in the making of my film? Is cash-for-a-hired-hand the only way? And if so, do those people really care anything about the "art" or are they just in it for the money? Do I really value their work less if I can not place a dollar value on it and fulfill that placement?
I have indeed met people who set limits. They own enough vehicles to fully fund my film and still have a car to drive. What's important to them? Not a film. It's having their fleet. Daughters are in ballet, gymnastics, tap dancing to the tune of $10K per year. Give that up? No. Annual vacation to the Caribbean? Can't give that up. Time share on the coast? Nope, need that too.
If I knew the real secret here I'd be sitting on a beach in a long white robe and every would-be filmmaker would cast thousand dollar bills at my feet for a head nod.
But, alas, I do not.
Permalink Reply by David M. Edwards on August 5, 2009 at 1:42pm Hi David,
Within the realm of screenwriting, personally, I set myself standards as there's always producers wanting the World for $10.
My shorts, which take me next to no time to write, go for credit and a copy of the finished product, but my features are a different ball game.
It's hard for any investor to make his/her money back on a short - hence the credit & copy.
Dean
Permalink Reply by Rhoda Cronebach on August 9, 2009 at 9:36pm You don't have to print to 35mm film to show at Sundance, they accept digital formats. Not sure about Tribeca though.
Permalink Reply by Den Stou on August 14, 2009 at 4:59am
Permalink Reply by Nicole Kruex - TRIWAR Pictures on August 15, 2009 at 5:43pm
Permalink Reply by David M. Edwards on September 11, 2009 at 8:25am Well, the up side is if as a group of professionals you choose NOT to work on those projects, you will eliminate the dabblers through natural selection there by resetting the balance of quality productions and perhaps ridding the industry of the lesser standards of pseudo filmmakers and camcorder jockeys.
© 2012 Created by indieProducer.net.
Powered by
